<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SEO Blog &#187; minority report</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.spidergourmet.com/category/minority-report/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.spidergourmet.com</link>
	<description>Helping you understand and benefit from SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 23:05:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Congressional investigators recommend blocking popular websites</title>
		<link>http://blog.spidergourmet.com/2009/10/pandemicblocking-popular-websites/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.spidergourmet.com/2009/10/pandemicblocking-popular-websites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[minority report]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.spidergourmet.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the event of a pandemic, we all hope that we can continue going about our business thanks to the Internet. However, in a report issued Monday, October 26, 2009, congressional investigators make an offhand recommendation that I&#8217;d like not to slip throguh the cracks because it smacks of a type of centralized control that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the event of a pandemic, we all hope that we can continue going about our business thanks to the Internet. However, in a report issued Monday, October 26, 2009, congressional investigators make an offhand recommendation that I&#8217;d like not to slip throguh the cracks because it smacks of a type of centralized control that I bridle against. </p>
<blockquote><p>Private Internet providers might need government authorization to block popular websites, it said, or to reduce residential transmission speeds to make way for commerce.</p></blockquote>
<p>And who, pray tell, decides what&#8217;s popular? I could get by fine without facebook, which reported is responsible for <a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2009/10/23/facebook-receives-one-fourth-of-us-page-views" target="_blank">1/4</a> of Internet pageviews, a lofty figure if I ever heard one. Someone else could be devastated by it. I&#8217;m sure <a href="http://blog.spidergourmet.com/2009/07/micro-hoo-mashup/">some companies</a> might quietly suggest that Google could stand to take a day off, but those that rely on their free services for documents, calenders and email would sing quite another tune!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.spidergourmet.com/2009/10/pandemicblocking-popular-websites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

